The massive questions for Federer-Nadal, Djokovic-Bautista Agut in males’s semifinals

LONDON — As quickly because the draw was made for the lads’s singles at Wimbledon, the presumption was that the ultimate 4 could be Novak Djokovic, Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and one different.

2 Associated

And so it has proved. The ‘Large Three’ have been in good type to date, with flashes of the dominance that has seen them win all however two of the Wimbledon singles titles since 2003 (Andy Murray has gained these different two).

Roberto Bautista Agut, the No. 23 seed from Spain, is the “different” individual making up this yr’s remaining 4, and he’ll face defending champion Djokovic in Friday’s semifinals, with Nadal and Federer assembly within the different semifinal for his or her first Wimbledon conflict because the epic remaining of 2008.

So how will issues play out? We turned to ESPN’s writers at Wimbledon to get their ideas.

Is the dominance of the Large Three at Grand Slams extra about their excellence or lack of opponents who can break by?

Pete Bodo: Completely about their excellence. There hasn’t been any sort of mysterious ailment or virus that impacts all however the Large Three. Any variety of gamers and/or circumstances might have derailed certainly one of these icons or considerably altered the narrative whereas they have been accumulating their 53 Grand Slam singles titles. But it surely did not occur. As Djokovic mentioned after his quarterfinal win: “Nadal, Federer, and myself, in a method we go onto subsequent degree when it comes to tennis and focus. We’re very devoted to those tournaments.” We could also be watching the three biggest gamers of this or some other period.

Alyssa Roenigk: A little bit of each. As we’re seeing on the ladies’s facet proper now, excellence is one factor. Sustained excellence is one other. Having one another as nice rivals has elevated all of their video games to a degree that’s robust to crack at this level, particularly late into Slams. To date, no big killer has been capable of again up a B3 takedown by successful a Slam. However they’re coming. (We see you, Stefanos Tsitsipas.)

D’Arcy Maine: To some extent, it is each, however I feel it is extra as a result of their collective excellence. They’re actually simply that good when it counts and within the huge moments. When it is best-of-five, because it clearly is within the Grand Slams, it is simply that a lot tougher for an upset to occur, and these three have the expertise, information and the expertise to drag out the win, even in opposition to robust, younger opponents.

Tom Hamilton: It is their unrelenting excellence however equally, their psychological fortitude. Yearly we discuss whether or not they’re coming to the top of their reign — pretenders have tried however didn’t dent that power subject. The trio’s displaying in 2019 has laughed within the face of the doubters.

Simon Cambers: It is extra about their excellence. These three guys are going to go down in historical past because the three finest gamers of all time and it’s their consistency, throughout the board, that has stored the subsequent era of their place. And their dominance has created auras that others haven’t been ready to deal with.

What’s your favourite second from the Rafa-Fed rivalry?

Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal in 2008. Antoine Couvercelle/Icon Sportswire

Bodo: I nonetheless love that second after they made the joint resolution to drag out of the 2006 Hamburg event (then a prestigious Masters 1000 occasion) on the Monday the occasion began. The rationale? The 2 warriors have been spent after going to the wire within the Sunday remaining in Rome [Nadal won it, 6-7(0) 7-6(5) 6-4 2-6 7-6(5)], lower than 24 hours earlier. The Rome Masters match was simply their sixth assembly. The Rafa = Clay/Fed = Grass narrative hadn’t struck roots but, and it was an thrilling preview of what these two males would accomplish over time.

Roenigk: Simply the 2008 Wimbledon remaining. There are few tennis matches I, an informal fan on the time, can bear in mind properly sufficient to inform you the place I used to be and what I used to be doing after they occurred. (Watching from a pal’s home in Park Metropolis over July four weekend.) This March, Nadal withdrew earlier than his scheduled semifinal match with Federer at Indian Wells, so I’ve by no means seen them play one another in individual. I’ll change my reply after Friday evening.

Maine: There are such a lot of wonderful moments, it needs to be laborious to decide on BUT the 2008 Wimbledon remaining has actually been referred to as “the best match ever” by so many over time, and it is laborious to argue. Federer had gained the final 5 singles titles on the All England Membership, and Nadal was on the lookout for his first one, and there was simply this palpable feeling, and a lot stress all through. You can see how a lot they each needed it. It went on for what felt like eternally, and was simply a type of epic battle of wills that ought to stay on eternally in sports activities lore. Onerous to prime that.

Hamilton: It is at all times laborious to park the reminiscences of that exceptional 2008 Wimbledon remaining however when you combine that with the earlier yr’s remaining, then in these two matches you might have the proper grasp of this rivalry. In 2007, Nadal confronted Federer within the Wimbledon remaining, however was left in tears after failing to see off his nemesis on grass. A yr later, after the ultimate to finish all finals, it was Nadal standing triumphant. Over the area of a yr, reminiscences of his heartbreak in 2007 stayed with him and it spurred him by in one of many biggest sporting moments of the 21st century.

Cambers: At Wimbledon, it must be their 2008 remaining. An apparent alternative, possibly, however that remaining had all the pieces, the proper distinction in types, maybe when the 2 males have been near their perfect degree. That Nadal might come out on prime, on Federer’s finest floor, was a monumental achievement.

What would be the key to Friday’s Rafa-Fed match?

Rafael Nadal celebrates his second-round win on July four. Mike Hewitt/Getty Photos

Bodo: With these two, it can come all the way down to which ones handles the large factors and stress conditions higher. Certain, Rafa could have the benefit within the rally sport, and Fed is the superior attacker. However Nadal has a greater web sport than he will get credit score for, and Federer’s groundstrokes, notably the forehand, have been devastating. Keep in mind, although, that Nadal has at all times specialised in breaking down these groundstrokes, particularly the Federer one-handed backhand. The grass will give Federer higher seems than he will get on clay in opposition to Nadal, however the rally sport — Nadal’s specialty — guidelines lately at Wimbledon.

Roenigk: Nadal has the boldness of a latest win over Federer on the French and a chip on his shoulder (see my prediction under), each of which is able to serve him properly Friday evening. Though it is laborious to wager in opposition to Federer on grass, I will. Nadal has appeared in prime type this week, having dropped just one set, to Nick Kyrgios within the second spherical, and the one factor higher than Nadal’s service video games has been his returns.

Maine: Nadal gained their final assembly handily on the French Open just some weeks in the past, so momentum could be very a lot on his facet, however, that is Federer on grass, so he has the sting there. Federer mentioned the 2017 Australian Open remaining (which he gained in 5) is likely to be essentially the most related match with Nadal to work off of heading into this semi, and what gained it for him that day is likely to be the important thing to victory for both participant — aggressively attacking, dominating with a strong serve, successful the lengthy rally factors, and simply staying as constant as potential. It is cliché to say this, however with gamers of this caliber, and who’re so acquainted with each other’s sport, it actually will most likely come all the way down to who desires it extra and who can simply get his degree barely larger than the opposite one.

Hamilton: Federer has had his wake-up name, having misplaced the primary set in opposition to Kei Nishikori within the quarterfinal, whereas Rafa Nadal is storming alongside properly, because of his straight-sets win over Sam Querrey. Nadal is the grasp at gamesmanship, pushing the 25-second serve rule to its most and has additionally conquered the artwork of difficult calls. Aggression is essential right here: if it is a baseline battle then Nadal wins, and Federer should match hearth with hearth. Nadal is enjoying some lovely, tactical tennis — as he confirmed in opposition to Querrey — and if he has alternatives to play these neat dropshots close to the online and strikes Federer round then it will be the Spaniard within the driving seat. For Federer, he wants to combine the tempo up, get in the best way of Nadal’s sport and time administration and trigger some unease.

Cambers: The Federer serve. He is been involved right here this yr about how troublesome it has been to hit aces or unreturnable serves, and he’ll want loads of them if he is to hit by Nadal, who’s been enjoying nice. If Federer serves near his finest, he’ll win.

What would Bautista Agut should do to beat Djokovic?

Roberto Bautista Agut connects throughout Wednesday’s win. Susan Mullane/USA TODAY Sports activities

Bodo: Bautista Agut might want to have a profession serving day if he hopes to maintain Djokovic at bay. Djokovic is on hearth. He is been practically flawless since surviving that tougher-than-it-looked third-round battle with rising expertise Hubert Hurkacz. However do not count on this to be a stroll within the park for Djokovic. RBA is the least well-known of this era’s wonderful grass-court performers. He has a clear, comparatively flat sport, and advantageous motion. His foremost drawback is that no one strikes higher than Djokovic. Bautista Agut’s forehand is his superior floor shot, so search for Djokovic to work on his backhand.

Roenigk: Effectively, he is carried out it earlier than — the previous two occasions they’ve met, truly, at Doha in January and Miami in March. However each of these wins got here on laborious courts. The 2 have truly by no means confronted one another on grass, a way more unpredictable floor. These wins, nevertheless, will serve Bautista Agut in addition to any tactic, by giving him the idea that he can beat the world No. 1.

Maine: Pray? Eat a balanced breakfast? If I knew I’d most likely be a coach at this level, however he’s going to want to play an almost flawless match, and hope it is an off day for Djokovic, after which he might need an opportunity. Nevertheless, the best way the world No. 1 has been rolling by this event makes that appear extremely troublesome.

Hamilton: Play the sport of his life. That is his first Grand Slam semifinal and whereas his splendidly unpredictable forehand is a potent weapon, he’ll must carry his A-game if he’s to knock Djokovic off his stride. He’ll must be way more aggressive, enhance on his serve returns and customarily be an enormous nuisance if he’s to trigger a serious upset.

Cambers: Play out of his thoughts. Djokovic is slightly higher at each a part of the sport than Bautista Agut, a lot as he was within the match-up with David Goffin, which suggests he ought to win in straight units. I simply do not see an upset.

What are your predictions for each semifinals?

Will Novak Djokovic get the possibility to defend his title? Laurence Griffiths/Getty Photos

Bodo: Djokovic will finish Bautista Agut’s wonderful run at Wimbledon, as a result of he shares many of the Spanish challenger’s finest qualities however none of his weaknesses — certainly one of which is his inexperience enjoying for such monumental stakes. Djokovic’s floor sport has been nothing lower than relentless at this event. As David Goffin mentioned after Djokovic gained their quarterfinal, “It is simply unimaginable. He is (Djokovic) simply crushing all the pieces in his method.” Nadal has survived a really robust draw that included three gamers whose video games are sufficiently big to take the racket out of any opponent’s hand. That has boosted his confidence, and offered good preparation for dealing with Federer’s wonderful serve. It is laborious to see Federer sustaining a sufficiently excessive degree of attacking tennis to maintain Nadal from returning to the ultimate for the primary time since 2011.

Roenigk: Rafa is on a roll, and he is doubtless nonetheless seething over Wimbledon seeding him behind Fed. I say he rolls proper into the ultimate. He’ll meet Djokovic there.

Maine: Djokovic wins simply in straight units (sorry, Bautista Agut, however take pleasure in your bachelor get together!), and Federer and Nadal have one other epic battle with Federer advancing to the ultimate after 5 gruelling units.

Hamilton: Djokovic will win in straight units whereas Nadal will see off Federer in 4 to tee up what guarantees to be essentially the most memorable of finals.

Cambers: Djokovic in straight units; Nadal in 4.